Log in
Skip to sidebar
Skip to main content
Linked Applications
Loading...
ODL Confluence
Spaces
Hit enter to search
Help
Online Help
Keyboard Shortcuts
Feed Builder
What’s new
Available Gadgets
About Confluence
Log in
OpenDaylight
Space shortcuts
Community Calendar
Documentation
Mailing Lists
JIRA
Gerrit
Anti-Trust Policy
Slack
Page tree
Browse pages
Configure
Space tools
A
t
tachments (1)
Amazon S3 Documents
Page History
Page Information
Resolved comments
View in Hierarchy
View Source
Export to PDF
Export to Word
Pages
…
OpenDaylight
Governance
Resolutions
Release Engineering Processes Approvals
Jira links
Release rebranding survey
Created by
Guillaume Lambert
, last modified on
Feb 08, 2021
Click for anchor link
release numbering
Actions
Export to CSV
Clear All Votes
Are you sure?
This operation will clear all the macro's data.
This can't be undone.
Click for anchor link
Summary
Question
Total Votes
Average Score
should we move from the period table to a more classical release number and which one ?
13
3.00
Click for anchor link
should we move from the period table to a more classical release number and which one ?
Choices
Your Vote
Current Result:
(13 Total Votes)
Comments
1- yes debian / lighty style
1 Vote , 7%
2- yes ubuntu style
11 Votes , 84%
3 - no keep it as it is for the moment
1 Vote , 7%
4 - no opinion
0 Votes , 0%
debian / lighty style : release number is incremented by +1 every new release
ubuntu style: use the year as the revision and the month as subrevision (e.g. April 2016 = 16.04)
No labels
Overview
Content Tools
{"serverDuration": 216, "requestCorrelationId": "3a33865b339c0e52"}